🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.