🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.