🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."